Hamilton Players’ mission is simple on paper: to enrich our community by inspiring and educating through the performing arts. That doesn’t sound difficult, does it?
Well… surprise!
It is far more complicated than it appears, and it all starts with choosing a
season. In previous blog posts, we’ve talked about licensing restrictions,
production costs, and the vital role of volunteers. But those are only part of
the equation. Season selection brings its own set of challenges - many of which
are invisible to the audience.
This is the
first in a three-part series:
Part
1: Choosing a Show
Part
2: Directing a Show
Part 3: Casting a Show
In this post,
we’re pulling back the curtain on how and why we choose the shows we do.
As we prepare
to announce our 2027 season, we find ourselves asking: How do we choose a
lineup that serves our mission, reflects our community, provides opportunities
for performers, and keeps the lights on? Every single show must satisfy all
four of those goals. Miss one, and the entire system starts to wobble.
Constraint #1: We Don’t Program in a Vacuum
One of the
first questions we ask is: “Is anyone else doing this show?” And more often
than you might expect, the answer is yes. In fact, we recently rebuilt an
entire season at the last minute because a neighboring theater announced
overlapping titles first. We made the decision to pivot. Not because we had to,
but because we believe community arts organizations should support, not compete
destructively with, one another. That kind of collaboration matters. But it
also narrows the field significantly.
Constraint #2: Representation and Reality
We are deeply
committed to equity and thoughtful representation in storytelling. But we also
have to work within the realities of our community. Ravalli County is
approximately 94.7% white (U.S. Census data). Many shows require specific
cultural representation that we simply cannot guarantee casting for, titles
like Hairspray, In the Heights, The Lion King, West Side Story, or The King and
I. Even a single role requiring a specific cultural identity can make a show
unproducible for us. And it is important to say this clearly: Our actors of color are valued members of our community - not casting
solutions. They should never feel tokenized or expected to participate based
solely on identity. This creates a difficult but necessary balance between
intention and reality.
Constraint #3: The Gender Paradox
Here’s where we often face actor dissatisfaction. Like many community theaters, we consistently see more female-presenting auditioners than male-presenting ones. So logically, you might think: “Great! Just pick shows with lots of women!” If only it were that simple. Many shows, especially well-known, licensable titles, are still written with male-heavy casts. And while some roles can be gender-flexible, licensing agreements often restrict how much we can alter. We hear the desire for more opportunities for women, and we share it. In fact, it is one of the most consistent factors we consider when building a season. But as you can see, it exists within a complex web of constraints that don’t always allow for simple solutions. So, we search for shows that feature strong and numerous female roles, allow (or don’t prohibit) gender flexibility, don’t require specific cultural casting we can’t fulfill, aren’t already being produced nearby, and are available for licensing. That Venn diagram gets very small, very fast.
Constraint #4: Audience Appeal vs. Artistic Responsibility
A show does not just need to be castable; it needs to sell. We must consider name recognition, audience interest, and content sensitivity. This is where another tension appears. Classic shows often come with outdated themes, stereotypes, or problematic language. Contemporary shows may include strong language or mature content that doesn’t align with all audience expectations. Every title becomes a balancing act. Is it engaging enough to draw a crowd, but thoughtful enough to present responsibly?
Constraint #5: One Community, Many Audiences
The
Bitterroot Valley is not a monolith. Our audience includes people with different
political views, different religious beliefs, different cultural expectations, and
different comfort levels with language and themes. Now try this exercise: Pick
one show that appeals broadly. Now pick another; different enough to reach a
new audience, but not so different that it alienates the first. Now do it
again. And again. By the time you’ve built a full season of 4–5 shows, you’re
not just programming - you’re negotiating with an entire community’s tastes,
values, and expectations.
Constraint #6: People Power (or Lack Thereof)
Even if a show checks every box on paper, there is still one final question: Do we have the people to make it happen? That means we need: a qualified, committed director, a cast willing to commit 8–10 weeks, designers and crew willing to commit 8-10 weeks, and musicians (if applicable). All those people are volunteers or part-time contributors with real lives, jobs, and obligations. A perfect show can fail simply because the right people aren’t available at the right time.
Constraint #7: Growth Without Alienation
Finally,
we must think long-term. We need to grow our audience, attract new performers,
and stay relevant. But growth requires risk. So, we constantly ask: How far can
we stretch without losing the community that built us? Push too little, and we
stagnate. Push too far, and we lose trust.
The Bigger Picture
Season
selection isn’t just about picking shows. It’s about stewarding a 30-year
legacy, balancing art and sustainability, creating opportunities, and serving a
diverse and evolving community…and doing it all again… every single year.
So, when you
see our upcoming season and are disposed to grumble or criticize, please
remember how difficult the task was, and know that we are trying to serve our
community - our whole community in the best way we know how. Take a risk,
step outside of your comfort zone, and go on the journey with us. You just
might like it!